Designing Authorship


One of the coolest things about the PLOS paper I was reading this morning — citation at the end of this post — is the way it distinguishes the different author contributions:

Screenshot 2018-10-22 12.18.28

 

Sort of like the credits at the end of film/television shows, no?

This is a model that other venues ought to adopt. It adds to the richness/meaning of the author list. Personally, I’d love to see something like this for ACM CHI or CSCW conferences. Some of those author lists get quite long, and the story of who did what gets a bit muddled. I am especially grateful that conceptualization has been called out as a contribution type. I place a great deal of value on conceptualization, and I am glad to see it reflected in this framework.

Citation: Chen, P-Y, Hayes, E, Lariviere, V, Sugimoto, CR (2018) Social reference managers and their users: A survey of demographics and ideologies. PLoS ONE 13(7): e0198033. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198033

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s